Negotiation Game Theory and Games - 13514 Words

NEGOTIATION Negotiation theory Last updated 9 months ago The foundations of negotiation theory are decision analysis, behavioral decision making, game theory, and negotiation analysis. Another classification of theories distinguishes between Structural Analysis, Strategic Analysis, Process Analysis, Integrative Analysis and behavioral analysis of negotiations. Individuals should make separate, interactive decisions; and negotiation analysis considers how groups of reasonably bright individuals should and could make joint, collaborative decisions. These theories are interleaved and should be approached from the synthetic perspective. Common Assumptions Of Most Theories Negotiation is a specialized and formal version of conflict†¦show more content†¦Therefore the parties have contradicting incentives to cooperate or defect. If one party cooperates or makes a concession and the other does not, the defecting party might relatively gain more. Trust may be built only in repetitive games through the emergence of reliable patterns of behaviour such as tit-for-tat. This table illustrates the options and possible outcomes of the Negotiator s Dilemma. Process Analysis Process analysis is the theory closest to haggling. Parties start from two points and converge through a series of concessions. As in strategic analysis, both sides have a veto (e.g. sell, not sell; pay, not pay). Process analysis also features structural assumptions, because one side may be weaker or stronger (e.g. more eager to sell, not willing to pay a certain price). Process Analysis focuses on the study of the dynamics of processes. E.g. both Zeuthen and Cross tried to find a formula in order to predict the behaviour of the other party in finding a rate of concession, in order to predict the likely outcome. The process of negotiation therefore is considered to unfold between fixed points: starting point of discord, end point of convergence. The so called security point, that is the result of optional withdrawal, is also taken into account. Integrative Analysis Integrative analysis divides the process into successive stages, rather than talking aboutShow MoreRelatedNegotiation: Game Theory3671 Words   |  15 PagesNegotiation | | The use of Game Theory could be a powerful force in negotiation. Investigate the different ways that Game Theory can be used or manipulated to change an outcome in a negotiation. | | Negotiation | | The use of Game Theory could be a powerful force in negotiation. Investigate the different ways that Game Theory can be used or manipulated to change an outcome in a negotiation. | | Quentin Dutartre Yash Ruia Damien Canneva Kilian Bus Emilien Allier DavidRead MoreNegotiation, Game Theory and Cultural Resource Management by K.M. Sullivan606 Words   |  2 PagesThe final article is â€Å"Negotiation, Game Theory and Cultural Resource Management† presented by K. M. Sullivan in 1986. This paper is about game theory and negotiation processes. It refers specifically to the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Services approach to cultural resource management. It has implications for academic researchers in dealings with Aboriginal people. In New South Wales where environmental impact assessment is required, the Service has the right to require archaeologicalRead More The Roles of Negotiation in Construction Essay1194 Words   |  5 PagesThe Roles of Negotiation in Construction Negotiation is a form of the decision-making process where two or more parties jointly search a space of possible solutions with the goal of reaching a consensus. In the construction industry, collaboration is an essential key for the success of projects. Since different participants from different organizations try to work together in projects, competitive stresses exist in their relationships and as a result, disputes orRead MoreSalary Negotiation in Job Interview949 Words   |  4 PagesIntroduction In any negotiation process, there are always constraints involved and decision making process involves an analysis of the gains and tradeoffs one has to go through to reach the best optimal solution Decision making process is not just a psychological process as perceived by many but more of a game theory because both the bidder and the negotiator are faced by various constraints, which both have to develop a model with both constraints and targets and later iterate to obtain an optimumRead MoreA Note On Sequential Game777 Words   |  4 PagesSequential Game I’m currently employed in the health care industry, but before my career began I worked for a major airline company for 5 years in various roles. Although I ended up choosing a career in the health care field because of its stability, I still find the airline industry a valuable and interesting market. To this day, I have many friends and acquaintances that still are employed within the industry and are involved in contracts negotiations for their respective companies. From experienceRead MoreBig Time Toymaker Scenario921 Words   |  4 PagesToymaker Scenario In chapter six of The Legal Environment of Business: A Managerial Approach: Theory to Practice, Melvin presents the case scenario of Big Time Toymaker (BTT) and Chou the game inventor. In the scenario, Chou invents a strategy game titled Strat. The scenario follows the events as BTT and Chou negotiate the potential distribution of Strat, ending with BTT declining to distribute the game. The legal issues presented are as follows: At what point, if ever, did the parties have aRead MoreEquilibrium Is Virtually Useless : An Argument Between The Conceptuality And The Practicality Of Nash Equilibrium1342 Words   |  6 PagesAumann Schelling’s work and Harsanyi’s theory. The Nash equilibrium offers a general solution when analysing complex strategic interaction. It was described as a major breakthrough in modern economics. To really appreciate the importance of it, we need to look into the role of rational decision making in economics, which is based on all agents to make rational decisions that maximise their utilities with complete information about the structure of the game. Each player’s choice is optimal givenRead MoreLaw 421959 Words   |  4 PagesScenario: Big Time Toymaker Read the â€Å"Theory to Practice† section at the end of Ch. 6 of the text. Answer Questions 1 through 6 based on the scenario in the â€Å"Theory to Practice† section, and complete the following in your response: At the conclusion of the situation, BTT says that its not serious about releasing Chou’s new technique game, Strat. Presuming BTT and Chou have got a deal, and BTT has breached the agreement by not releasing the game, discuss what solutions may or may not applyRead MoreLaw 421952 Words   |  4 PagesCase Scenario: Big Time Toymaker Read the â€Å"Theory to Practice† section at the end of Ch. 6 of the text. Answer Questions 1 through 6 based on the scenario in the â€Å"Theory to Practice† section, and complete the following in your response: At the conclusion of the situation, BTT says that its not serious about releasing Chou’s new technique game, Strat. Presuming BTT and Chou have got a deal, and BTT has breached the agreement by not releasing the game, discuss what solutions may or may not applyRead MoreToymaker Law/421974 Words   |  4 PagesRead the â€Å"Theory to Practice† section at the end of Ch. 6 of the text. Answer Questions 1 through 6 based on the scenario in the â€Å"Theory to Practice† section, and complete the following in your response: †¢ At the end of the scenario, BTT states that it is not interested in distributing Chou’s new strategy game, Strat. Assuming BTT and Chou have a contract, and BTT has breached the contract by not distributing the game, discuss what remedies might or might not apply. At what point, if ever, did